We are instructed that our client has not at any time prevented your client from seeing Raphael. (by showing displeasure, and by distracting him with things making him not come out) We are further instructed that your client should know that the last time Raphael was with her overnight, he was left extremely hungry when our client picked him up after 11.00am in the morning. (Due to his lateness and his promise to bring raphael out for lunch) Raphael informed our client that your client did not provide him with any breakfast (which obviously i did and he knows it but as time went by, he conveniently change his memory) and that he did not want to go with her anymore. (Which was not true, as Raphael did not want to come out cos he was always promised things which make him choose to stay at home and wait for him. But in the later part, he has taught him well and reminded him of that incident so that he would know how to repeat only that incident and not have the feeling of wanting to go out with us anymore) Despite that, our client has not at any time dissuaded Raphael from going to your client. (Which he did, not dissuaded... but forbid with actions and pressure my son)As regards to our client's mother splashing water on your client, we are instructed that when your client was at the front gate and Raphael did not respond to her, she went to the back of the house. (Which the police also did, went behind whenever she did not respond) On seeing our client's mother, she started hurling insults (Just stating the facts that why she asked her friend to go out to the front gate to say that nobody is at home which she is at home, which proves that she is lying all the while) at our client's mother. It should therefore not surprise your client (of course, surprised as i didn't know that she will stoop so low, although this is not the first time the mother uses water as an excuse to dirty me) that our client's mother reacted the way she did.

We are instructed to inform that our client's mother's rights against your client are also reserved. (So am i to say that i could do the same to her... with my flask of soup when she say something that doesn't sound right to me)

We are instructed that your client is at liberty to make all the claims of how loving a mother she has been to Raphael, but Rpahael being a precocious child, knows exactly who the better parent is (what is the meaning of better, brain washing, insinuating, immoral, despicable, uneducated, loser) and what 'spending quality time' with your client (he took one month mc to brain wash the kid after i told him that i want custody of raphael) means. Our client and his mother have not and need not influence Raphael on his thoughts about his mother. (he needs to as he is insecure that he may lose custody of the kid as i have told him that i am going to fight for it as raphael asked me to) All it took was for your client to neglect him on one occasion (only on one occasion! And he can remember? A child does not bear grudges at this kind of age unless being drilled into remembering the details which he did) and Raphael himself decided that he is better off with our client than yours. (Due to brain washing)

We are instructed that your client has been coming to our client's home on Fridays to pick Raphale and our client has not prevented Raphael (he did by not opening the gate and ignoring us. Actions speak louder than words) from going with your client if he wanted to. However, each time your client was at our client's home, she behaved like a deranged woman (try taking a kid away from a mother and you will get the same result from a normal woman) hurling insults (advise and facts of the injustice done to me) at our client and his mother and taking photographs of them (to show what kind of treatment we get when we visit raphael). She has also been calling for the police who spoke with Raphael (Police has to be there incase he turn violent towards us as he had threatened to do so). All these actions are done in the presence of the child. (By yelling at elders and using foul languages in front of Raphael is he setting a better example) Thus, instead of improving her relationship with Raphael, your client has worsened it. (Worsen due to their brain washing and negative remarks whenever we visit him) She should therefore not blame our client or his mother that the child does not want to go with her. (Raphael's actions each time when being asked a question he would look at the father before he can decide what answer does the father wants him to say.... fear of reprisal.... poor son. Every policemen and friends who were there with me, said that it is very obvious that he did the brain washing of the kid. So now left with only the judge to judge with pictures edvidence and police report. Now the son never mentioned the other mommy already due to him telling him not to?? Last time, he cannot stop mentioning... maybe i should request that the judge to ask raphael a few questions, i don't believe that the judge cannot see through a kid actions and words)




5 hunters:

Anonymous shoots...
wtf it's so obvious
8/3/06 09:07

Wei shoots...
wow thats like lying without concious... sighz... i hope the judge is wise enuff to see whos lying... nut case! n bullshit lawyer
8/3/06 21:48

Anonymous shoots...
stay strong ... the truth will come to light
8/3/06 22:05

kk shoots...
hes doing more harm to the kid
10/3/06 14:12

Anonymous shoots...
Fight for full custody. Woman Chartered.
10/3/06 18:23